When NOT to use sIFR font emedding

2007 November 20
by Barry

Web.com have updated their website today, implementing the much debated sIFR technique to embed their funky font within the design.

While I think sIFR has a place for web design, I think this is a poor implementation by web.com, which is backed up difference in appearance in my 3 main browsers (on Mac OSX)

Opera 9

Opera

Firefox 2

Firefox

Safari 3

Safari

Only Safar3 managed to correctly render the jaggy font which is used throughout the website, Firefox2 & Opera9 both render it as a green/orange blocky mess. This seriously affects not only the design of the site but also the credibility, and also has SEO implications (although having a domain name like as web.com can’t be too much of a bad thing)

I'd LOVE if you shared this:
Talk to me on Twitter!

I'm @barryhand on Twitter.
Talk to me, that's how I find people to follow :)
Click here to find me on Twitter.

  • http://thejokebank.com/ Kevin

    Looks fine to me on FF2; I’m on Windows.

  • http://thejokebank.com Kevin

    Looks fine to me on FF2; I’m on Windows.

blog comments powered by Disqus